Roth v. Mayor of Bayonne

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Roth v. Mayor of Bayonne

89 A. 51, 85 N.J.L. 386, 56 Vroom 386, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 303

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided December 4, 1913·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The questions presented for consideration by this writ of error are identical with those discussed by us in the opinion delivered at this term in the ease of McGrath v. Bayonne, ante p. 188; and for the reasons set ont in that opinion the judgment under review in the present case will be reversed.

For affirmance — None.

For reversal — The Chibe Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Bergen, Yoorhees, Kalisch, Yredenburgh, Congdon, White, Terhune, Heppeniieimer, JJ. 11.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The questions presented for consideration by this writ of error are identical with those discussed by us in the opinion delivered at this term in the ease of McGrath v. Bayonne, ante p. 188; and for the reasons set ont in that opinion the judgment under review in the present case will be reversed.

For affirmance — None.

For reversal — The Chibe Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Bergen, Yoorhees, Kalisch, Yredenburgh, Congdon, White, Terhune, Heppeniieimer, JJ. 11.

Roth v. Mayor of Bayonne, 89 A. 51, 85 N.J.L. 386, 56 Vroom 386, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 303 (N.J. 1913).

Pincite

89 A. 51 (Roth v. Mayor of Bayonne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.