Roth v. Luck

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Roth v. Luck

90 S.E.2d 247, 243 N.C. 175, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 550

DecidedNovember 23, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 90 S.E.2d 247 (Roth v. Luck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roth v. Luck, 90 S.E.2d 247, 243 N.C. 175, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 550 (N.C. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

PER Cukiam.

We think the plaintiff’s evidence was sufficient to carry the case to the jury. Consequently, the defendant’s exceptions to the ruling of the court below on the defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit, are overruled. The additional exceptions present no error sufficiently prejudicial to justify a disturbance of the verdict below.

No error.

HiggiNS, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER Cukiam.

We think the plaintiff’s evidence was sufficient to carry the case to the jury. Consequently, the defendant’s exceptions to the ruling of the court below on the defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit, are overruled. The additional exceptions present no error sufficiently prejudicial to justify a disturbance of the verdict below.

No error.

HiggiNS, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 S.E.2d 247, 243 N.C. 175, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roth-v-luck-nc-1955.