Roth v. Loftin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Roth v. Loftin

218 S.W. 89, 1920 Tex. App. LEXIS 40

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 9, 1920

DocketNo. 524.

StatusPublished

This text of 218 S.W. 89 (Roth v. Loftin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roth v. Loftin, 218 S.W. 89, 1920 Tex. App. LEXIS 40 (Tex. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

■ HIGHTOWER, C. J.

This is an appeal from- the county court of Hardin county; appellants contending in their brief that the county court of Hardin county erroneously granted and perpetuated an injunction against them in favor of the appellee.

An inspection of the record in this case fails to disclose any final judgment or ap-pealable order by the county court of Hardin county in this cause, and for such reason this court has no jurisdiction of this appeal.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal be dismissed at appellants’ cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

■ HIGHTOWER, C. J.

This is an appeal from- the county court of Hardin county; appellants contending in their brief that the county court of Hardin county erroneously granted and perpetuated an injunction against them in favor of the appellee.

An inspection of the record in this case fails to disclose any final judgment or ap-pealable order by the county court of Hardin county in this cause, and for such reason this court has no jurisdiction of this appeal.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal be dismissed at appellants’ cost.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

218 S.W. 89, 1920 Tex. App. LEXIS 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roth-v-loftin-texapp-1920.