Roth v. Insurance Co. of North America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Roth v. Insurance Co. of North America

49 A.D.2d 914, 375 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11173

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 14, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.D.2d 914 (Roth v. Insurance Co. of North America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roth v. Insurance Co. of North America, 49 A.D.2d 914, 375 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11173 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action inter alia to recover a sum of money, defendant appeals (by permission) from an order of the Appellate Term, Ninth and Tenth Judicial Districts, dated January 7, 1975, which (1) reversed a judgment of the City Court, City of Yonkers, entered April 30, 1974, in favor of defendant upon the trial court’s dismissal of the complaint at the close of plaintiffs’ case, at a jury trial, and (2) ordered a new trial. Order affirmed, with costs, on the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Term. No questions of fact were presented of considered on the instant appeal. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Christ and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action inter alia to recover a sum of money, defendant appeals (by permission) from an order of the Appellate Term, Ninth and Tenth Judicial Districts, dated January 7, 1975, which (1) reversed a judgment of the City Court, City of Yonkers, entered April 30, 1974, in favor of defendant upon the trial court’s dismissal of the complaint at the close of plaintiffs’ case, at a jury trial, and (2) ordered a new trial. Order affirmed, with costs, on the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Term. No questions of fact were presented of considered on the instant appeal. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Christ and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 914, 375 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roth-v-insurance-co-of-north-america-nyappdiv-1975.