Roth v. G. A. Feld Co.
This text of 59 Misc. 214 (Roth v. G. A. Feld Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
I agree to an affirmance of the judgment herein. The invitation from defendant to the plaintiff to use the stairs in question justified the plaintiff in assuming that they were not dangerous, since it was the duty [215]*215of the defendant to maintain them in a reasonably safe condition. The proof introduced by plaintiff established a prima facie case of negligence on the part of the defendant; and, in the absence of any explanation by the defendant, the plaintiff was entitled to judgment. Schnizer v. Phillips, 108 App. Div. 17.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Greenbaum, J., concurs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 Misc. 214, 110 N.Y.S. 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roth-v-g-a-feld-co-nyappterm-1908.