Roth v. Dry Dock, East Broadway & Battery Railroad

Superior Court of New York

Roth v. Dry Dock, East Broadway & Battery Railroad

26 N.Y.S. 1134

CourtThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

DecidedDecember 29, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 26 N.Y.S. 1134 (Roth v. Dry Dock, East Broadway & Battery Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roth v. Dry Dock, East Broadway & Battery Railroad, 26 N.Y.S. 1134 (superctny 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

FREEDMAN, J.

There was no error In the refusal of the trial Judge to dismiss the complaint, or to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant. Upon all the facts disclosed, the case was clearly one for the jury, and, upon due examination, we cannot say that the verdict which was rendered in favor of the plaintiff is contrary to the evidence, or against the weight of the evidence, or excessive in amount. The defendant’s exceptions are clearly untenable. The judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FREEDMAN, J.

There was no error In the refusal of the trial Judge to dismiss the complaint, or to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant. Upon all the facts disclosed, the case was clearly one for the jury, and, upon due examination, we cannot say that the verdict which was rendered in favor of the plaintiff is contrary to the evidence, or against the weight of the evidence, or excessive in amount. The defendant’s exceptions are clearly untenable. The judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 N.Y.S. 1134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roth-v-dry-dock-east-broadway-battery-railroad-superctny-1893.