Roth v. Beth El Hospital, Inc.

279 A.D. 917, 110 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5301

This text of 279 A.D. 917 (Roth v. Beth El Hospital, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roth v. Beth El Hospital, Inc., 279 A.D. 917, 110 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5301 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Opinion

The defendant hospital is not liable for the medical treatment by its interne. (Bakal v. University Heights Sanitarium, 277 App. Div. 572, affd. 302 N. Y. 870.) Judgment for defendant Addes reversed on the law and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The proof was sufficient to constitute a prima facie ease of malpractice. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Wenzel and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bakal v. University Heights Sanitarium, Inc.
100 N.E.2d 51 (New York Court of Appeals, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 A.D. 917, 110 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roth-v-beth-el-hospital-inc-nyappdiv-1952.