Roth Flower Co. v. United States
52 Cust. Ct. 338, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3553
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMay 7, 1964
DocketNo. 68519; protests 62/11775, etc. (New York)
StatusPublished
This text of 52 Cust. Ct. 338 (Roth Flower Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Roth Flower Co. v. United States, 52 Cust. Ct. 338, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3553 (cusc 1964).
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, identified on the invoices as item No. 1401, is not in chief value of yarns, threads, or filaments and is in chief value of other material, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
52 Cust. Ct. 338, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roth-flower-co-v-united-states-cusc-1964.