Rotella v. State

919 So. 2d 608, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 295, 2006 WL 120047
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 18, 2006·No. No. 3D05-1638·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The denial of appellant’s petition for writ of prohibition is affirmed on the merits. See Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436, 90 S.Ct. 1189, 25 L.Ed.2d 469 (1970); Gragg v. State, 429 So.2d 1204 (Fla.1983).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rotella v. State, 919 So. 2d 608, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 295, 2006 WL 120047 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

919 So. 2d 608 (Rotella v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ashe v. Swenson
397 U.S. 436 (Supreme Court, 1970)
Gragg v. State
429 So. 2d 1204 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)