Rotella v. State
919 So. 2d 608, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 295, 2006 WL 120047
This text of 919 So. 2d 608 (Rotella v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rotella v. State, 919 So. 2d 608, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 295, 2006 WL 120047 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
Opinion
The denial of appellant’s petition for writ of prohibition is affirmed on the merits. See Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436, 90 S.Ct. 1189, 25 L.Ed.2d 469 (1970); Gragg v. State, 429 So.2d 1204 (Fla.1983).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ashe v. Swenson
397 U.S. 436 (Supreme Court, 1970)
Gragg v. State
429 So. 2d 1204 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
919 So. 2d 608, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 295, 2006 WL 120047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rotella-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.