Rotchford v. Meade

20 F. Cas. 1254, 3 D.C. 650, 3 Cranch 650

This text of 20 F. Cas. 1254 (Rotchford v. Meade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rotchford v. Meade, 20 F. Cas. 1254, 3 D.C. 650, 3 Cranch 650 (circtddc 1829).

Opinion

The Court (nem. con.) was of opinion that several counts cannot be joined, in cognizance in replevin; and especially claims in different rights, which could not be joined in a declaration.

Judgment for the plaintiff on the demurrer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 F. Cas. 1254, 3 D.C. 650, 3 Cranch 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rotchford-v-meade-circtddc-1829.