Rotch v. Hamilton
This text of 7 Utah 513 (Rotch v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case no transcript of the record has been filed. There is a paper filed purporting to be a statement on motion for a new trial and on appeal. It is full of erasures, and there are many interlineations. The pleadings and orders of the court are not in it. It is indorsed by the referee as the evidence in the case pertinent to the specifications of error. The transcript should be a copy certified by the clerk of the court where the trial is had to be a copy of the entire record in the ease. This paper seems to be the original paper filed in the district clerk’s office. It does not give a full history of the case, nor does the abstract. This appeal is therefore dismissed, on the motion of this court. 2 Comp. Laws, | 3650.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Utah 513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rotch-v-hamilton-utah-1891.