Rotan v. Springer

52 Ark. 80
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMay 15, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 52 Ark. 80 (Rotan v. Springer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rotan v. Springer, 52 Ark. 80 (Ark. 1889).

Opinion

Per Curiam :

Judgments: Injuction. The plaintiff offered no suggestion of a defense to the claim upon which, the judgment which he sought to enjoin was based. His complaint, therefore, stated no cause of action (State v. Hill, 50 Ark., 458), and the court did not err in sustaining the demurrer. Affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cantwell v. Cantwell
143 N.E.2d 275 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1957)
Baskin v. Mosaic Templars of America
4 S.W.2d 932 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1928)
Bernhard v. Idaho Bank & Trust Co.
123 P. 481 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1912)
Robinson v. Arkansas Loan & Trust Co.
85 S.W. 413 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 Ark. 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rotan-v-springer-ark-1889.