Home/Supreme Court of Arkansas/Rotan v. Springer

Rotan v. Springer

52 Ark. 80
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided May 15, 1889·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

Judgments: Injuction. The plaintiff offered no suggestion of a defense to the claim upon which, the judgment which he sought to enjoin was based. His complaint, therefore, stated no cause of action (State v. Hill, 50 Ark., 458), and the court did not err in sustaining the demurrer. Affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rotan v. Springer, 52 Ark. 80 (Ark. 1889).

52 Ark. 80 (Rotan v. Springer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cantwell v. Cantwell
143 N.E.2d 275 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1957)
Baskin v. Mosaic Templars of America
4 S.W.2d 932 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1928)
Bernhard v. Idaho Bank & Trust Co.
123 P. 481 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1912)
Robinson v. Arkansas Loan & Trust Co.
85 S.W. 413 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1905)