ROSWELL MOTORS, INC. v. CITY OF ROSWELL

Court of Appeals of Georgia

ROSWELL MOTORS, INC. v. CITY OF ROSWELL

DecidedJune 7, 2023

DocketA23A0414

StatusPublished

This text of ROSWELL MOTORS, INC. v. CITY OF ROSWELL (ROSWELL MOTORS, INC. v. CITY OF ROSWELL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

ROSWELL MOTORS, INC. v. CITY OF ROSWELL, (Ga. Ct. App. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ June 07, 2023

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A23A0414. ROSWELL MOTORS, INC. v. CITY OF ROSWELL et al.

After the City of Roswell and Roswell City Council denied Roswell Motors, Inc.’s application for a conditional use zoning permit, Roswell Motors petitioned for a writ of certiorari in the superior court. The superior court dismissed the petition as untimely, and Roswell Motors filed this direct appeal seeking review of that judgment. We lack jurisdiction. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1) provides that a discretionary application is required to appeal “decisions of the superior courts reviewing decisions of . . . state and local administrative agencies . . . by certiorari or de novo proceedings.” An appeal from a superior court order reviewing a decision of the local zoning authority regarding zoning regulations applied to a particular piece of property is subject to the discretionary application procedures set out in OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1). Diversified Holdings, LLP v. City of Suwanee, 302 Ga. 597, 605 (II) (807 SE2d 876) (2017). Likewise, an appeal from a superior court order dismissing a certiorari petition requires a discretionary application. See Taylor v. City of Atlanta, 184 Ga. App. 795, 795 (363 SE2d 45) (1987). Where an appellant has failed to follow the discretionary review procedures required by OCGA § 5-6-35, the appeal must be dismissed. See Brewer v. Bd. of Zoning Adjustment of Atlanta, 170 Ga. App. 351 (317 SE2d 327) (1984) (appeal from superior court’s dismissal of zoning appeal dismissed due to appellant’s failure to file discretionary application). Because Roswell Motors failed to file an application for discretionary review and obtain an order permitting the appeal, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 06/07/2023 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ June 07, 2023

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A23A0414. ROSWELL MOTORS, INC. v. CITY OF ROSWELL et al.

After the City of Roswell and Roswell City Council denied Roswell Motors, Inc.’s application for a conditional use zoning permit, Roswell Motors petitioned for a writ of certiorari in the superior court. The superior court dismissed the petition as untimely, and Roswell Motors filed this direct appeal seeking review of that judgment. We lack jurisdiction. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1) provides that a discretionary application is required to appeal “decisions of the superior courts reviewing decisions of . . . state and local administrative agencies . . . by certiorari or de novo proceedings.” An appeal from a superior court order reviewing a decision of the local zoning authority regarding zoning regulations applied to a particular piece of property is subject to the discretionary application procedures set out in OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1). Diversified Holdings, LLP v. City of Suwanee, 302 Ga. 597, 605 (II) (807 SE2d 876) (2017). Likewise, an appeal from a superior court order dismissing a certiorari petition requires a discretionary application. See Taylor v. City of Atlanta, 184 Ga. App. 795, 795 (363 SE2d 45) (1987). Where an appellant has failed to follow the discretionary review procedures required by OCGA § 5-6-35, the appeal must be dismissed. See Brewer v. Bd. of Zoning Adjustment of Atlanta, 170 Ga. App. 351 (317 SE2d 327) (1984) (appeal from superior court’s dismissal of zoning appeal dismissed due to appellant’s failure to file discretionary application). Because Roswell Motors failed to file an application for discretionary review and obtain an order permitting the appeal, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 06/07/2023 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

ROSWELL MOTORS, INC. v. CITY OF ROSWELL, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roswell-motors-inc-v-city-of-roswell-gactapp-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack