Rostain v. Katz
146 P.2d 248, 63 Cal. App. 2d 839, 1944 Cal. App. LEXIS 1010
Opinion
This is an action to quiet title. The material facts are precisely similar to those in the case of Rostain v. Guggenheim, this day decided, ante, p. 127 [146 P.2d 247] and the issues and questions raised are exactly the same. For the reasons stated in the decision in that case the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Marks, J., and Griffin, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rostain v. Katz, 146 P.2d 248, 63 Cal. App. 2d 839, 1944 Cal. App. LEXIS 1010 (Cal. Ct. App. 1944).
146 P.2d 248 (Rostain v. Katz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rostain v. Guggenheim
146 P.2d 247 (California Court of Appeal, 1944)