Rostain v. Katz
146 P.2d 248, 63 Cal. App. 2d 839, 1944 Cal. App. LEXIS 1010
This text of 146 P.2d 248 (Rostain v. Katz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rostain v. Katz, 146 P.2d 248, 63 Cal. App. 2d 839, 1944 Cal. App. LEXIS 1010 (Cal. Ct. App. 1944).
Opinion
This is an action to quiet title. The material facts are precisely similar to those in the case of Rostain v. Guggenheim, this day decided, ante, p. 127 [146 P.2d 247] and the issues and questions raised are exactly the same. For the reasons stated in the decision in that case the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Marks, J., and Griffin, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rostain v. Guggenheim
146 P.2d 247 (California Court of Appeal, 1944)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
146 P.2d 248, 63 Cal. App. 2d 839, 1944 Cal. App. LEXIS 1010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rostain-v-katz-calctapp-1944.