Rost v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rost v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad

45 N.Y.S. 1147

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 8, 1897

StatusPublished

This text of 45 N.Y.S. 1147 (Rost v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rost v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad, 45 N.Y.S. 1147 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

No opinion. Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, unless the plaintiff within 20 days stipulates to .reduce the recovery of damages to $20,000 and- extra allowance proportionately. In that event, the judgment is so modified, and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur, except GOODRICH, P. J., who dissents solely on the ground that the recovery, as thus reduced, is excessive. See 41 N. Y. Supp. 1069, 1130.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

No opinion. Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, unless the plaintiff within 20 days stipulates to .reduce the recovery of damages to $20,000 and- extra allowance proportionately. In that event, the judgment is so modified, and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur, except GOODRICH, P. J., who dissents solely on the ground that the recovery, as thus reduced, is excessive. See 41 N. Y. Supp. 1069, 1130.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 N.Y.S. 1147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rost-v-brooklyn-heights-railroad-nyappdiv-1897.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack