Rosson v. Goodrum

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Rosson v. Goodrum

221 So. 2d 518, 253 La. 1084, 1969 La. LEXIS 2934

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 25, 1969·No. No. 49757·Published

Opinion

In re: James E. Goodrum and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Madison. 219 So.2d 802.

The application is denied. According to the facts, as found to be by the Court of Appeal, there appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.

BARHAM, J., is of the opinion that the writ should be granted. I am doubtful that R.S. 32:141 is applicable and believe that there is a misapplication of the Dixie Drive It Case, Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Co., 242 La. 471, 137 So.2d 298.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: James E. Goodrum and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Madison. 219 So.2d 802.

The application is denied. According to the facts, as found to be by the Court of Appeal, there appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.

BARHAM, J., is of the opinion that the writ should be granted. I am doubtful that R.S. 32:141 is applicable and believe that there is a misapplication of the Dixie Drive It Case, Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Co., 242 La. 471, 137 So.2d 298.

Rosson v. Goodrum, 221 So. 2d 518, 253 La. 1084, 1969 La. LEXIS 2934 (La. 1969).

Pincite

221 So. 2d 518 (Rosson v. Goodrum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related