Rosso v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Rosso v. State

267 S.W. 1116, 99 Tex. Crim. 10, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 28

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 7, 1925·No. No. 9134.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale. Punishment is confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record contains no bills of exception. There is on file in this court what purports to be a statement of facts but it has never been signed by the attorneys either for the state or appellant. It is not approved by the trial judge, and neither does it bear the file mark of *11 the clerk of the lower court. In such condition it can not be considered.

The record presents no matter for review, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale. Punishment is confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record contains no bills of exception. There is on file in this court what purports to be a statement of facts but it has never been signed by the attorneys either for the state or appellant. It is not approved by the trial judge, and neither does it bear the file mark of *11 the clerk of the lower court. In such condition it can not be considered.

The record presents no matter for review, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Rosso v. State, 267 S.W. 1116, 99 Tex. Crim. 10, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 28 (Tex. 1925).

Pincite

267 S.W. 1116 (Rosso v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related