Rosso v. State

267 S.W. 1116, 99 Tex. Crim. 10, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 28
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 7, 1925
DocketNo. 9134.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 267 S.W. 1116 (Rosso v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosso v. State, 267 S.W. 1116, 99 Tex. Crim. 10, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 28 (Tex. 1925).

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale. Punishment is confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record contains no bills of exception. There is on file in this court what purports to be a statement of facts but it has never been signed by the attorneys either for the state or appellant. It is not approved by the trial judge, and neither does it bear the file mark of *11 the clerk of the lower court. In such condition it can not be considered.

The record presents no matter for review, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hall v. State
40 S.W.2d 85 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
267 S.W. 1116, 99 Tex. Crim. 10, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosso-v-state-texcrimapp-1925.