Rossman v. Morasco
980 A.2d 912, 293 Conn. 923
This text of 980 A.2d 912 (Rossman v. Morasco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rossman v. Morasco, 980 A.2d 912, 293 Conn. 923 (Colo. 2009).
Opinion
ROBERT J. ROSSMAN
v.
Patricia MORASCO et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Paul A. Sobel, Bridgeport, in support of the petition.
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 115 Conn.App. 234, 974 A.2d 1 (2009), is denied.
ROGERS, C.J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rossman v. Morasco
974 A.2d 1 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
980 A.2d 912, 293 Conn. 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rossman-v-morasco-conn-2009.