Rossiter v. Pitt

90 S.E.2d 597, 93 Ga. App. 44
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 8, 1955·No. 35919·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Townsend, J.

A judgment sustaining any or all demurrers to a petition and allowing time for amendment is not subject to exception or review. Code § 81-1001 as amended (Ga. L. 1952, p. 243; Aiken v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 88 Ga. App. 131 (76 S. E. 2d 141); Cates v. Owens, 87 Ga. App. 270 (73 S. E. 2d 345); Community Theatres Co. v. Burney, 87 Ga. App. 165 (73 S. E. 2d 104); Barron v. Foster, 87 Ga. App. 119 (73 S. E. 2d 102); Thornton v. Courvoisier, 90 Ga. App. 26 (81 S. E. 2d 842). The amendment of 1953 to Code § 81-1001 (Ga. L. 1953, p. 82), did not change this rule. Adams v. Ricks, 91 Ga. App. 494 (1b) (86 S. E. 2d 329). It follows that the writ of error to a judgment overruling general and special demurrers and allowing the plaintiff fifteen days for amendment is premature and must be

Dismissed.

Gardner, P. J., and Carlisle, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rossiter v. Pitt, 90 S.E.2d 597, 93 Ga. App. 44 (Ga. Ct. App. 1955).

90 S.E.2d 597 (Rossiter v. Pitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rochester Capital Leasing Corp. v. Christian
137 S.E.2d 518 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
Lumbermen's Underwriting Alliance v. Jessup
112 S.E.2d 337 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)
Lax v. Hospital Authority Employees Credit Union
100 S.E.2d 613 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)