Rossiter v. Pitt

90 S.E.2d 597, 93 Ga. App. 44
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 8, 1955
Docket35919
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 90 S.E.2d 597 (Rossiter v. Pitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rossiter v. Pitt, 90 S.E.2d 597, 93 Ga. App. 44 (Ga. Ct. App. 1955).

Opinion

Townsend, J.

A judgment sustaining any or all demurrers to a petition and allowing time for amendment is not subject to exception or review. Code § 81-1001 as amended (Ga. L. 1952, p. 243; Aiken v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 88 Ga. App. 131 (76 S. E. 2d 141); Cates v. Owens, 87 Ga. App. 270 (73 S. E. 2d 345); Community Theatres Co. v. Burney, 87 Ga. App. 165 (73 S. E. 2d 104); Barron v. Foster, 87 Ga. App. 119 (73 S. E. 2d 102); Thornton v. Courvoisier, 90 Ga. App. 26 (81 S. E. 2d 842). The amendment of 1953 to Code § 81-1001 (Ga. L. 1953, p. 82), did not change this rule. Adams v. Ricks, 91 Ga. App. 494 (1b) (86 S. E. 2d 329). It follows that the writ of error to a judgment overruling general and special demurrers and allowing the plaintiff fifteen days for amendment is premature and must be

Dismissed.

Gardner, P. J., and Carlisle, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rochester Capital Leasing Corp. v. Christian
137 S.E.2d 518 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
Lumbermen's Underwriting Alliance v. Jessup
112 S.E.2d 337 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)
Lax v. Hospital Authority Employees Credit Union
100 S.E.2d 613 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 S.E.2d 597, 93 Ga. App. 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rossiter-v-pitt-gactapp-1955.