Rossiter v. Pitt
This text of 90 S.E.2d 597 (Rossiter v. Pitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A judgment sustaining any or all demurrers to a petition and allowing time for amendment is not subject to exception or review. Code § 81-1001 as amended (Ga. L. 1952, p. 243; Aiken v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 88 Ga. App. 131 (76 S. E. 2d 141); Cates v. Owens, 87 Ga. App. 270 (73 S. E. 2d 345); Community Theatres Co. v. Burney, 87 Ga. App. 165 (73 S. E. 2d 104); Barron v. Foster, 87 Ga. App. 119 (73 S. E. 2d 102); Thornton v. Courvoisier, 90 Ga. App. 26 (81 S. E. 2d 842). The amendment of 1953 to Code § 81-1001 (Ga. L. 1953, p. 82), did not change this rule. Adams v. Ricks, 91 Ga. App. 494 (1b) (86 S. E. 2d 329). It follows that the writ of error to a judgment overruling general and special demurrers and allowing the plaintiff fifteen days for amendment is premature and must be
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 S.E.2d 597, 93 Ga. App. 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rossiter-v-pitt-gactapp-1955.