Rossi v. Stanback
632 A.2d 695, 227 Conn. 912, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 344
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 15, 1993
DocketSC 14827
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 632 A.2d 695 (Rossi v. Stanback) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rossi v. Stanback, 632 A.2d 695, 227 Conn. 912, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 344 (Colo. 1993).
Opinion
The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 31 Conn. App. 703 (AC 11297), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court committed reversible error by failing to provide the jury with separate plaintiffs’ verdict forms for each count of the complaint?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rossi v. Stanback
650 A.2d 920 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1994)
Rossi v. Stanback
644 A.2d 352 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
632 A.2d 695, 227 Conn. 912, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rossi-v-stanback-conn-1993.