Rossi v. Shapiro
This text of 146 Misc. 376 (Rossi v. Shapiro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant was not guilty of a “ misbehavior in his office or trust ” or of a “ violation of duty therein,” within the meaning of subdivision 1 of section 753 of the Judiciary Law, when he stored the car in a public garage after having taken the precautions revealed by the record. (Depew v. Solomonowitz, 48 App. Div. 512, 514.) Nor can he be charged with a willful disobedience of the court’s mandate, since his inability to return the car was not the result of a contumacious act.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion denied.
All concur; present, Lydon, Frankenthaler and Untermyer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
146 Misc. 376, 262 N.Y.S. 94, 1933 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rossi-v-shapiro-nyappterm-1933.