Rossi v. Portuondo

273 A.D.2d 573, 711 N.Y.S.2d 340, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6692

This text of 273 A.D.2d 573 (Rossi v. Portuondo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rossi v. Portuondo, 273 A.D.2d 573, 711 N.Y.S.2d 340, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6692 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Torraca, J.), entered March 25, 1999 in [574]*574Ulster County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue in this proceeding has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto will be expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Witherspoon v Goord, 243 AD2d 931).

Crew III, J. P., Peters, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Witherspoon v. Goord
243 A.D.2d 931 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
273 A.D.2d 573, 711 N.Y.S.2d 340, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rossi-v-portuondo-nyappdiv-2000.