Rossi v. O'Connell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rossi v. O'Connell

277 A.D.2d 857

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 13, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 857 (Rossi v. O'Connell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rossi v. O'Connell, 277 A.D.2d 857 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

It appears that the finding of the State Liquor Authority that the proposed financing of the business was not satisfactory is unsupported and was not pressed upon the appeal. There is no evidence that petitioner was connected, [858]*858in any way, with the landlord or previous licensee. Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ. [197 Misc. 718.] [See post, p. 873.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appears that the finding of the State Liquor Authority that the proposed financing of the business was not satisfactory is unsupported and was not pressed upon the appeal. There is no evidence that petitioner was connected, [858]*858in any way, with the landlord or previous licensee. Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ. [197 Misc. 718.] [See post, p. 873.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rossi-v-oconnell-nyappdiv-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack