Rossi v. O'Connell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rossi v. O'Connell

277 A.D.2d 857

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 13, 1950·Published

Opinion

It appears that the finding of the State Liquor Authority that the proposed financing of the business was not satisfactory is unsupported and was not pressed upon the appeal. There is no evidence that petitioner was connected, [858] in any way, with the landlord or previous licensee. Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ. [197 Misc. 718.] [See post, p. 873.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appears that the finding of the State Liquor Authority that the proposed financing of the business was not satisfactory is unsupported and was not pressed upon the appeal. There is no evidence that petitioner was connected, [858] in any way, with the landlord or previous licensee. Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ. [197 Misc. 718.] [See post, p. 873.]

Rossi v. O'Connell, 277 A.D.2d 857 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

277 A.D.2d 857 (Rossi v. O'Connell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related