Rossi v. Jackson
This text of 51 P.3d 674 (Rossi v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Respondent, the Coos County Sheriff, revoked appellant’s concealed handgun license. The trial court upheld the revocation, and appellant appeals. ORS 166.293(2) permits a sheriff to deny a license if the sheriff has reasonable grounds to believe
“that the applicant has been or is reasonably likely to be a danger to self or others, or to the community at large, as a result of the applicant’s mental or psychological state, as demonstrated by past pattern of behavior or participation in incidents involving unlawful violence or threats of unlawful violence.” (Emphasis added.)
Any act or condition that would justify denial of a license is also cause for revoking a license. ORS 166.293(3)(a).
Respondent revoked appellant’s license based on a single incident that could well give reason to believe that appellant may be a danger to self or others. However, the statute requires that appellant’s mental state be demonstrated by a “past pattern of behavior or participation in incidents” before revocation is authorized. A single incident does not constitute a pattern, nor does it show participation in “incidents.” There is insufficient evidence in this record to demonstrate that appellant’s mental or psychological state satisfies the statutory standard for revocation of his license.
Reversed and remanded with instructions to order license reinstated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 P.3d 674, 183 Or. App. 235, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rossi-v-jackson-orctapp-2002.