Rossi v. Garner

724 So. 2d 603, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15246, 1998 WL 835126
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 4, 1998·No. No. 97-4758·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appealed order is affirmed except as to the requirement that the appellee pay only a portion of the appellant’s attorney’s fee and costs. Based on the great disparity in the parties’ incomes and financial positions, we conclude that the failure to award the full amount of the appellant’s reasonable attorney’s fee and costs was an abuse of discretion. See, e.g., Tanck v. Tanck, 675 So.2d 1039 (Fla.App. 1st DCA 1996). The order is therefore reversed as to this ruling, and the case is remanded.

BARFIELD, C.J., ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rossi v. Garner, 724 So. 2d 603, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15246, 1998 WL 835126 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

724 So. 2d 603 (Rossi v. Garner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marcell v. Marcell
842 So. 2d 945 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Mobley v. Mobley
778 So. 2d 343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)