Rossi v. County Court of Schoharie

31 A.D.2d 715, 295 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2563
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 27, 1968·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Proceeding under CPLR article 78 for an order prohibiting the respondents from proceeding against petitioner under an indictment charging him with criminally negligent homicide (Penal Law, § 125.10). Petitioner asserts that the statute, amp'ified by the statutory definition of “ Criminal negligence ” (Penal Law, [716] § 15.05, subd. 4), is unconstitutional for vagueness. Other remedies are available to petitioner and since, in our view, the statute is not on its face unconstitutional, petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested. (Matter of Fenster v. Criminal Ct. of City of N. Y., 46 Misc 2d 179, affd. 24 A D 2d 840, affd. 17 N Y 2d 641.) Application denied and cross motion by respondents to dismiss petition granted, .without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum Per Curiam.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rossi v. County Court of Schoharie, 31 A.D.2d 715, 295 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2563 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

31 A.D.2d 715 (Rossi v. County Court of Schoharie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Pizarro
155 Misc. 2d 741 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1992)
People v. Ohrenstein, Babbush, Sanzillo & Montalto
153 A.D.2d 342 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)