Rossetti v. City of New Britain

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Rossetti v. City of New Britain

278 A.2d 826, 161 Conn. 591

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rossetti v. City of New Britain. Read the opinion of the Court — 163 Conn. 283 →

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided July 9, 1971·Published

Opinion

On the plaintiff’s motion from the Superior Court in New Haven County at Waterbury for an order regarding the filing of appeal briefs, it is ordered, pursuant to the provisions of Practice Book § 724, that the defendant-appellant shall first file its brief, after which the plaintiff-appellee and cross-appellant shall file his brief as such appellee and cross-appellant. Thereafter, the defendant may file a reply brief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On the plaintiff’s motion from the Superior Court in New Haven County at Waterbury for an order regarding the filing of appeal briefs, it is ordered, pursuant to the provisions of Practice Book § 724, that the defendant-appellant shall first file its brief, after which the plaintiff-appellee and cross-appellant shall file his brief as such appellee and cross-appellant. Thereafter, the defendant may file a reply brief.

Rossetti v. City of New Britain, 278 A.2d 826, 161 Conn. 591 (Colo. 1971).

Pincite

278 A.2d 826 (Rossetti v. City of New Britain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.