Rosser-El v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Rosser-El v. United States

50 F. App'x 111

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 6, 2002·No. No. 02-1627·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal the district court’s order dismissing their complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Rosser-El v. United States, No. CA-02-293-AW (D. Md. filed Apr. 2, 2002, entered Apr. 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal the district court’s order dismissing their complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Rosser-El v. United States, No. CA-02-293-AW (D. Md. filed Apr. 2, 2002, entered Apr. 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Rosser-El v. United States, 50 F. App'x 111 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

50 F. App'x 111 (Rosser-El v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related