Rossen & Cohen v. Novak

270 A.2d 465, 259 Md. 508
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided December 1, 1970·No. [No. 100, September Term, 1970.]·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order for appeal in this case was filed on January 19, 1970. Pursuant to the request of the appellant, the trial court extended the time for transmitting the record *509 to May 1,1970. The record was actually transmitted April 28, 1970. Maryland Rule 825 b provides “the lower court shall not extend the time [for transmitting the record] to a day more than ninety days from the date after the first order for appeal is filed.” The record was transmitted more than 90 days after the date the appeal was filed. It does not appear that the delay was occasioned by “the neglect, omission or inability of the clerk of the lower court, the court stenographer or appellee” as specified in Maryland Rule 825 d. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed. Goldman v. Tauber, 258 Md. 174, 265 A. 2d 225 (1970).

If the case had been considered on its merits, we would have affirmed the decree of the trial court.

Appeal dismissed; appellants to pay the costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rossen & Cohen v. Novak, 270 A.2d 465, 259 Md. 508 (Md. 1970).

270 A.2d 465 (Rossen & Cohen v. Novak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Uhler v. Real Properties, Inc.
421 A.2d 966 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1980)
Young v. State
346 A.2d 669 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1975)
Jacober v. High Hill Realty, Inc.
321 A.2d 838 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1974)
Balliet v. BALTO. CTY. BAR ASS'N
270 A.2d 465 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1970)