Rossbach v. Beebe

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Rossbach v. Beebe

55 A. 320, 205 Pa. 652, 1903 Pa. LEXIS 635

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 4, 1903

DocketAppeal, No. 174

StatusPublished

This text of 55 A. 320 (Rossbach v. Beebe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rossbach v. Beebe, 55 A. 320, 205 Pa. 652, 1903 Pa. LEXIS 635 (Pa. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is an effort .to rescind a sale for fraudulent representations by the buyer, on the faith of which plaintiffs parted with their goods. But the referee found affirmatively that the rep[653]*653resentations were not fraudulent but made in good faith, and his finding has been approved by the court. It was a question of fact depending on the weight of evidence and the credibility of witnesses. It has not been shown that there was any clear error.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

This is an effort .to rescind a sale for fraudulent representations by the buyer, on the faith of which plaintiffs parted with their goods. But the referee found affirmatively that the rep[653]*653resentations were not fraudulent but made in good faith, and his finding has been approved by the court. It was a question of fact depending on the weight of evidence and the credibility of witnesses. It has not been shown that there was any clear error.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A. 320, 205 Pa. 652, 1903 Pa. LEXIS 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rossbach-v-beebe-pa-1903.