Rossbach Associates, Inc. v. Realty Associates, Inc.
282 A.D. 657, 122 N.Y.S.2d 163
Opinions
There is no support in the record for the jury’s finding that commissions had been earned on the mortgage transaction. The award of commissions on that branch of the hiring was therefore improper. Accordingly the judgment appealed should be modified, with costs, by eliminating the mortgage commission and dismissing the third, and fourth causes of action, and otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rossbach Associates, Inc. v. Realty Associates, Inc., 282 A.D. 657, 122 N.Y.S.2d 163 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).
282 A.D. 657 (Rossbach Associates, Inc. v. Realty Associates, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron Company
83 N.Y. 378 (New York Court of Appeals, 1881)
Gallagher v. Dullea
199 A.D. 119 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921)
John M. Thompson & Co. v. New Madison Square Garden Corp.
225 A.D. 521 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)
Stern v. Bristol Corp.
273 A.D. 371 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)
Stern v. Bristol Corp.
298 N.Y. 766 (New York Court of Appeals, 1948)