Rossano v. Recore

Second Circuit

Rossano v. Recore

21 F. App'x 80

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedOctober 26, 2001

DocketNo. 00-0251

StatusPublished

This text of 21 F. App'x 80 (Rossano v. Recore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rossano v. Recore, 21 F. App'x 80 (2d Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be AFFIRMED.

James Rossano, pro se and incarcerated, appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellants James F. Recore, et al. (McAvoy, J.). We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in Judge McAvoy’s thorough Decision and Order. See James Rossano v. James F. Recore, 97-CV-1231 (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 3, 2000).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be AFFIRMED.

James Rossano, pro se and incarcerated, appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellants James F. Recore, et al. (McAvoy, J.). We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in Judge McAvoy’s thorough Decision and Order. See James Rossano v. James F. Recore, 97-CV-1231 (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 3, 2000).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 F. App'x 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rossano-v-recore-ca2-2001.