Rossa v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Rossa v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

807 A.2d 871, 570 Pa. 1

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rossa v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board. Read the opinion of the Court — 576 Pa. 349 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 25, 2002·No. Appeal No. 162 EAL 2002·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of September, 2002, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following issues:

1) Whether a Workers’ Compensation Judge has authority to determine paternity.

2) If such authority exists, and in consideration of the factors set forth in Minnich v. Rivera, 509 Pa. 588, 506 A.2d 879 (1986), what is the applicable standard of proof [2]*2for paternity determinations in Workers’ Compensation proceedings?

The City of Philadelphia’s Petition for Supersedeas is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of September, 2002, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following issues:

1) Whether a Workers’ Compensation Judge has authority to determine paternity.

2) If such authority exists, and in consideration of the factors set forth in Minnich v. Rivera, 509 Pa. 588, 506 A.2d 879 (1986), what is the applicable standard of proof [2]*2for paternity determinations in Workers’ Compensation proceedings?

The City of Philadelphia’s Petition for Supersedeas is DENIED.

Rossa v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board, 807 A.2d 871, 570 Pa. 1 (Pa. 2002).

Pincite

807 A.2d 871 (Rossa v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related