Rossa v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

807 A.2d 871, 570 Pa. 1
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 25, 2002
DocketAppeal No. 162 EAL 2002
StatusPublished

This text of 807 A.2d 871 (Rossa v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rossa v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board, 807 A.2d 871, 570 Pa. 1 (Pa. 2002).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of September, 2002, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following issues:

1) Whether a Workers’ Compensation Judge has authority to determine paternity.
2) If such authority exists, and in consideration of the factors set forth in Minnich v. Rivera, 509 Pa. 588, 506 A.2d 879 (1986), what is the applicable standard of proof [2]*2for paternity determinations in Workers’ Compensation proceedings?

The City of Philadelphia’s Petition for Supersedeas is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Minnich v. Rivera
506 A.2d 879 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
807 A.2d 871, 570 Pa. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rossa-v-workers-compensation-appeal-board-pa-2002.