Rossa ex rel. Rossa v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Philadelphia)

807 A.2d 871, 570 Pa. 1, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 2011
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 25, 2002·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of September, 2002, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following issues:

1) Whether a Workers’ Compensation Judge has authority to determine paternity.

2) If such authority exists, and in consideration of the factors set forth in Minnich v. Rivera, 509 Pa. 588, 506 A.2d 879 (1986), what is the applicable standard of proof for paternity determinations in Workers’ Compensation proceedings?

The City of Philadelphia’s Petition for Su-persedeas is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rossa ex rel. Rossa v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Philadelphia), 807 A.2d 871, 570 Pa. 1, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 2011 (Pa. 2002).

807 A.2d 871 (Rossa ex rel. Rossa v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Philadelphia)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rossa v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
839 A.2d 256 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2003)