Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Ross-Williams v. Williams

Ross-Williams v. Williams

69 A.D.3d 919, 892 N.Y.2d 789
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 26, 2010·Published

Opinion

In light of the defendant’s tactics which unnecessarily prolonged the litigation, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting that branch of the motion of the nonparty expert evaluator which was, in effect, to direct the defendant to pay his expert fees in their entirety (see O’Brien v O’Brien, 66 NY2d 576, 590 [1985]; Bogannam v Bogannam, 60 [920]*920AD3d 985, 987 [2009]; Conway v Conway, 29 AD3d 725 [2006]; Miklos v Miklos, 21 AD3d 353 [2005]; Levy v Levy, 4 AD3d 398, 399 [2004]). Covello, J.E, Angiolillo, Balkin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ross-Williams v. Williams, 69 A.D.3d 919, 892 N.Y.2d 789 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

69 A.D.3d 919 (Ross-Williams v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

O'Brien v. O'Brien
489 N.E.2d 712 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Levy v. Levy
4 A.D.3d 398 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Miklos v. Miklos
21 A.D.3d 353 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Conway v. Conway
29 A.D.3d 725 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Bogannam v. Bogannam
60 A.D.3d 985 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)