Ross-Williams v. Williams

69 A.D.3d 919, 892 N.Y.2d 789

This text of 69 A.D.3d 919 (Ross-Williams v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ross-Williams v. Williams, 69 A.D.3d 919, 892 N.Y.2d 789 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

In light of the defendant’s tactics which unnecessarily prolonged the litigation, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting that branch of the motion of the nonparty expert evaluator which was, in effect, to direct the defendant to pay his expert fees in their entirety (see O’Brien v O’Brien, 66 NY2d 576, 590 [1985]; Bogannam v Bogannam, 60 [920]*920AD3d 985, 987 [2009]; Conway v Conway, 29 AD3d 725 [2006]; Miklos v Miklos, 21 AD3d 353 [2005]; Levy v Levy, 4 AD3d 398, 399 [2004]). Covello, J.E, Angiolillo, Balkin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'Brien v. O'Brien
489 N.E.2d 712 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Levy v. Levy
4 A.D.3d 398 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Miklos v. Miklos
21 A.D.3d 353 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Conway v. Conway
29 A.D.3d 725 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Bogannam v. Bogannam
60 A.D.3d 985 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 A.D.3d 919, 892 N.Y.2d 789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-williams-v-williams-nyappdiv-2010.