Ross v. Young

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: October 2, 2009
• Docket: 08-8333
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8333

ANNETTE ROSS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MR. YOUNG, Therapist; MR. BARLOWE, Therapist; DR. PAYLO, Mental Health Director; S. JOHNSON, Correctional Officer; MR. HAUSKINS, Sgt. of F.C.C.W.; MS. HULL, Unit Director/Security of Bldg #2; MS. WALKER, Asst. Warden of F.C.C.W.; SGT. GONZALES, Sargent of F.C.C.W.; DR. DAVID, Psychiatrist for F.C.C.W.; DR. MCDONALD, Doctor of F.C.C.W.; DR. RAMOLI, Doctor of F.C.C.W.; CAPTAIN JONES, Captain, MS. M. JONES, Hearing Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:08-cv-00522-jct-mfu)

Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 2, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Annette Ross, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Annette Ross appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Ross v. Young, No. 7:08-cv-00522-jct-mfu (W.D. Va.

Oct. 16, 2008. We deny Ross’s motion to reconsider the denial

of her motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED