Ross v. Whitman

6 Cal. 361
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1856
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 6 Cal. 361 (Ross v. Whitman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ross v. Whitman, 6 Cal. 361 (Cal. 1856).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt.

Mr. Chief Justice Murray concurred.

Where any of the duties or powers of one of the departments of the State Government are not disposed of, or distributed to particular officers of that department, such powers or duties are left to the disposal of the Legislature.

[365]*365Where, therefore, the Legislature appointed a board, consisting of three executive State officers, to perform a certain duty which theretofore had been performed by the Comptroller of State, but which is not prescribed by the Constitution as the peculiar duty of that officer, we hold the Act valid and binding, because the power of the Legislature is supreme, except where it is expressly restricted.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tirapelle v. Davis
20 Cal. App. 4th 1317 (California Court of Appeal, 1993)
Untitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports, 1988

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Cal. 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-whitman-cal-1856.