Ross v. Valentik

900 So. 2d 752, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6640, 2005 WL 1047279
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 2, 2005·No. No. 5D05-389·Published

Opinion

PLEUS, J.

Petitioner, Donald E. Ross, seeks certio-rari review of the circuit court order temporarily removing him as guardian of Peter Schubert and appointing a professional guardian.

Certiorari is an extraordinary remedy which cannot be used to circumvent the rule limiting interlocutory appeals. To be entitled to certiorari review of a non-final order, a petitioner must show that the order is a departure from the essential requirements of law, causing irreparable injury which cannot be adequately remedied on plenary appeal. Belair v. Drew, 770 So.2d 1164, 1166 (Fla.2000). Petitioner has failed to establish any irreparable injury due to his temporary removal as guardian. The circuit court has already commenced the hearing to determine whether petitioner should be permanently removed. We expressly decline to address the merits of the circuit court’s decision to remove petitioner temporarily.

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIO-RARI DENIED.

ORFINGER and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ross v. Valentik, 900 So. 2d 752, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6640, 2005 WL 1047279 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

900 So. 2d 752 (Ross v. Valentik) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Belair v. Drew
770 So. 2d 1164 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)