Ross v. United States of America

District Court, D. Arizona·Decided May 16, 2023·No. 4:22-cv-00556·Unknown

Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5

9 Victor Ross, No. CV-22-00556-TUC-JCH

10 Plaintiff, CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

11 v.

12 United States of America, et al.,

13 Defendants. 14 15 The Court enters the following Case Management Order: 16 1. Initial Disclosures. The parties shall exchange initial disclosures required under 17 Rule 26(a)1 by June 16, 2023. 18 2. Pleading Deadline. The deadline for joining parties, amending pleadings, and 19 filing supplemental pleadings is 60 days from the date of this Order. 20 3. Discovery Limitations. Depositions are limited to seven hours each as provided in 21 Rule 30(d)(1). Each side may propound up to 25 interrogatories, including 22 subparts, 25 requests for production of documents, including subparts, and 25 23 requests for admissions, including subparts. 24 4. Fact Discovery. The deadline for completing fact discovery, including discovery 25 by subpoena, is January 31, 2024. To ensure compliance with this deadline, the 26 following rules shall apply: 27 a. Depositions: All depositions shall be scheduled to commence at least five 28 1 All rules reference the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure unless otherwise indicated. 1 working days before the fact discovery deadline. A deposition commenced 2 five days before the deadline may continue up until the deadline, as 3 necessary. 4 b. Written Discovery: All interrogatories, requests for production of 5 documents, and requests for admissions shall be served at least 45 days 6 before the fact discovery deadline. 7 c. Extensions: The parties may agree in writing, without Court approval, to 8 extend the time provided for discovery responses in Rules 33, 34, and 36. 9 Such agreed-upon extensions, however, do not alter or extend the Court's 10 discovery deadlines. 11 d. Special Provisions Regarding Rule 34 Responses: Objections to Rule 34 12 document production requests shall be stated with specificity; general or 13 boilerplate objections are not permitted. Document production in response 14 to a Rule 34 request shall be completed by the time specified in the request 15 or another reasonable time specified in the response. An objection to a Rule 16 34 request shall state whether any responsive materials have been withheld 17 based upon that objection. 18 5. Expert Disclosures and Discovery. 19 a. Plaintiff(s) shall complete expert disclosures required under 20 Rule 26(a)(2)(A)–(C) by October 16, 2023. 21 b. Defendant(s) shall complete expert disclosures required under 22 Rule 26(a)(2)(A)–(C) by October 16, 2023. 23 c. Rebuttal expert disclosures, if any, shall be made by November 20, 2023. 24 Rebuttal experts are limited to responding to opinions stated by initial 25 experts. 26 d. Replies to expert rebuttals, if any, shall be made by December 29, 2023. 27 e. Expert depositions shall be completed by January 31, 2024, and shall 28 commence at least five working days before that deadline. 1 f. Disclosures under Rule 26(a)(2)(A) shall include the identities of treating 2 physicians and other witnesses who will provide testimony under Federal 3 Rules of Evidence 702, 703, or 705, but who are not required to provide 4 expert reports under Rule 26(a)(2)(B). Rule 26(a)(2)(C) disclosures are 5 required for such witnesses on the dates set forth above. Rule 26(a)(2)(C) 6 disclosures shall identify not only the subjects on which the witness will 7 testify but shall also provide a summary of the facts and opinions to which 8 the expert will testify. The summary, clearly not as detailed as a 9 Rule 26(a)(2)(B) report, shall be sufficiently detailed to provide fair notice 10 of what the expert will say at trial.2 11 g. As stated in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 26 (1993 12 Amendments), expert reports under Rule 26(a)(2)(B) shall set forth "the 13 testimony the witness is expected to present during direct examination, 14 together with the reasons therefor." Full and complete disclosures of such 15 testimony are required on the dates set forth above; absent extraordinary 16 circumstances, parties will not be permitted to supplement expert reports 17 after these dates. The Court notes, however, that it usually permits parties 18 to present opinions of their experts that were elicited by opposing counsel 19 during depositions of the experts. Counsel should depose experts with this 20 in mind. 21 h. Each side is limited to one testifying expert witness per issue. 22 6. Expedited Procedure for Resolving Discovery and Disclosure Disputes. 23 a. The parties shall not file written discovery/disclosure motions without leave 24 of Court. This procedure applies to all disputes between parties to the 25 2 In Goodman v. Staples The Office Superstore, LLC, 644 F.3d 817 (9th Cir. 2011), the 26 Ninth Circuit held that “a treating physician is only exempt from Rule 26(a)(2)(B)’s written report requirement to the extent that his opinions were formed during the course 27 of treatment.” Id. at 826. Thus, for opinions formed outside the course of treatment, Rule 26(a)(2)(B) written reports are required. Id. For opinions formed during the course of 28 treatment, Rule 26(a)(2)(C) disclosures will suffice. 1 action that could properly be addressed in motions for protective order 2 under Rule 26(c), disclosure under Rule 37(a), or motions to compel.3 3 b. When the parties have a dispute that could properly be addressed under 4 Rule 26(c), Rule 37(a), or motions to compel, they shall file with the court 5 a joint statement of discovery/disclosure dispute. The joint statement shall 6 not exceed 3 pages of explanatory text, with each party entitled to submit 7 one and one-half pages of that text. Parties shall not file a joint statement 8 without first seeking to resolve the matter through personal consultation 9 and sincere effort as required by Local Rules of Civil Procedure 7.2(j). The 10 purposes of the joint statement are to notify the court of the dispute, and to 11 make a record of the discovery or disclosure sought. Briefing on the dispute 12 is permitted only if ordered by the Court. 13 c. Unless the Court orders otherwise, the parties may jointly contact the court 14 by telephone or email to request a hearing on the joint statement of 15 discovery/disclosure dispute. The Court will schedule the matter at the 16 earliest convenient time, whether by telephone or in-person. The Court may 17 order written briefing if it does not resolve the dispute during the 18 conference. Any briefing ordered by the Court shall also comply with Local 19 Rule of Civil Procedure 7.2(j). 20 d. The Court may issue a minute entry setting forth the resolution of the 21 discovery dispute. After resolution, a party may file with the Court those 22 materials necessary to create a record of the discovery or disclosure the 23 Court permitted or denied. 24 e. Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not entertain fact 25 discovery disputes after the deadline for completion of fact discovery and 26 will not entertain expert discovery disputes after the deadline for 27 3 The prohibition on “written discovery motions” includes any written materials 28 delivered, emailed or faxed to the Court, including hand-delivered correspondence with attachments. 1 completion of expert discovery. 2 7. Dispositive Motions. 3 a. Dispositive motions shall be filed by February 29, 2024. Such motions 4 shall comply in all respects with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 5 the Local Rules. 6 b. No party shall file more than one motion for summary judgment under 7 Rule 56 without permission from the Court. 8 c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ross v. United States of America, (D. Ariz. 2023).

Ross v. United States of America (Ross v. United States of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goodman v. Staples the Office Super-Store, LLC
644 F.3d 817 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)