Ross v. United States
Opinion
ON MOTION
ORDER
Michael S. Ross submits a nonconforming brief, which the court treats as a motion to reinstate his appeal. Ross also submits various letters about his case.
Any arguments should be in the briefs, not in separate letters to the court.
Upon consideration thereof,
It Is Ordered That:
The motion is granted, the mandate is recalled, and the appeal is reinstated. The nonconforming brief is accepted as Ross’s opening informal brief. The United States should calculate its brief due date from the date of service of this order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
470 F. App'x 879 (Ross v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.