Ross v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 18, 2023·No. 23-40058·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 23-40058 Document: 00516824326 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/18/2023

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

____________ FILED July 18, 2023

No. 23-40058 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk

Robert Ross,

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

United States of America,

Defendant—Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:21-CV-607

Before Dennis, Engelhardt, and Wilson, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Robert Ross appeals from the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of his Federal Tort Claims Act complaint. However, the district court construed his post-judgment motion as a timely motion to alter or amend judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e), granted that construed motion, and reinstated his complaint. Because the judgment of

*

This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case: 23-40058 Document: 00516824326 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/18/2023

No. 23-40058

dismissal from which Ross filed his construed notice of appeal is no longer in effect, the appeal does not present a live controversy and is moot. See United States v. Heredia-Holguin, 823 F.3d 337, 340 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc).

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED as MOOT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ross v. United States, (5th Cir. 2023).

Ross v. United States (Ross v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. David Heredia-Holguin
823 F.3d 337 (Fifth Circuit, 2016)