Ross v. Triad Financial Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Ross v. Triad Financial Corp.

255 F. App'x 742

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 28, 2007·No. No. 07-1764·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Daniel H. Ross appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ross v. Triad Financial Corp., No. 8:06-cv-02122-RWT (D. Md. July 10 & 24, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Daniel H. Ross appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ross v. Triad Financial Corp., No. 8:06-cv-02122-RWT (D. Md. July 10 & 24, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Ross v. Triad Financial Corp., 255 F. App'x 742 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

255 F. App'x 742 (Ross v. Triad Financial Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.