Ross v. Todd

4 Ohio C.C. 1
CourtOhio Circuit Courts
DecidedApril 15, 1889
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Ohio C.C. 1 (Ross v. Todd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ross v. Todd, 4 Ohio C.C. 1 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1889).

Opinion

Cox, J.

Although section 5242 does not in terms exclude as a witness-a party when the adverse party is the guardian of an “ imbecile,” yet we think the judgment of the court below in excluding him was correct. Section 5240 makes persons of “unsound mind’ ’ incompetent as witnesses, and section 5242 excludes from testifying a party when the opposite party is the guardian of an “ insane person.” We think an “ imbecile ” comes within the meaning and spirit of the law. He is a person of' “ unsound mind,” and is by section 5240 an imcompetent witness. Whatever changes have from time to time been made by the legislature in section 5252, the spirit and intent of that-section has never been changed in ijhis particular, that a. party shall not testify in his own ..case where the opposite-party is the guardian of a person under such a disability from any mental infirmity as to be incompetent as a witness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Ohio C.C. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-todd-ohiocirct-1889.