Ross v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Ross v. State

264 S.W.2d 959, 156 Tex. Crim. 164

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 6, 1951

DocketNo. 24630

StatusPublished

This text of 264 S.W.2d 959 (Ross v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ross v. State, 264 S.W.2d 959, 156 Tex. Crim. 164 (Tex. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The judgment of conviction was affirmed by the Court of Criminal Appeals on June 7, 1950, and appellant’s motion for rehearing was overruled October 25, 1950, 233 S.W.2d 126, and mandate issued.

Thereafter, appellant made application to the Supreme Court of the United States for a writ of certiorari which was granted, 340 U.S. 946, 71 S.Ct. 529, and on April 30, 1951, 341 U.S. 918, 71 S.Ct. 742, the Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas and remanded said cause for further proceedings not inconsistent with said order of the Supreme Court of the United States.

Therefore, in compliance with said order this cause is now remanded to the District Court of Galveston County, 56th Judicial District, for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The judgment of conviction was affirmed by the Court of Criminal Appeals on June 7, 1950, and appellant’s motion for rehearing was overruled October 25, 1950, 233 S.W.2d 126, and mandate issued.

Thereafter, appellant made application to the Supreme Court of the United States for a writ of certiorari which was granted, 340 U.S. 946, 71 S.Ct. 529, and on April 30, 1951, 341 U.S. 918, 71 S.Ct. 742, the Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas and remanded said cause for further proceedings not inconsistent with said order of the Supreme Court of the United States.

Therefore, in compliance with said order this cause is now remanded to the District Court of Galveston County, 56th Judicial District, for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 S.W.2d 959, 156 Tex. Crim. 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-state-texcrimapp-1951.