Ross v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ross v. State

1913 OK CR 331, 133 P. 1197, 10 Okla. Crim. 640, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 286

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 26, 1913

DocketNo. A-1768.

StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK CR 331 (Ross v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ross v. State, 1913 OK CR 331, 133 P. 1197, 10 Okla. Crim. 640, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 286 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Prank Ross, was convicted at the March, 1912, term of the county court of Pottawatomie county on a charge of conducting a gambling game commonly known as “poker,” and his punishment fixed at a fine of $250 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 30 days. We have carefully examined the record and find no error sufficient to justify a reversal of the judgment. It is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Prank Ross, was convicted at the March, 1912, term of the county court of Pottawatomie county on a charge of conducting a gambling game commonly known as “poker,” and his punishment fixed at a fine of $250 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 30 days. We have carefully examined the record and find no error sufficient to justify a reversal of the judgment. It is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1913 OK CR 331, 133 P. 1197, 10 Okla. Crim. 640, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-state-oklacrimapp-1913.