Ross v. State
575 S.W.3d 806
This text of 575 S.W.3d 806 (Ross v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ross v. State, 575 S.W.3d 806 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).
Opinion
Antawan Ross appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2)&(5).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
575 S.W.3d 806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-state-moctapp-2019.