Ross v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ross v. State

413 S.W.3d 33, 2013 WL 5797666, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1284

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 29, 2013·No. No. WD 75607·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Bobby Gene Ross appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief by the- Circuit Court of Howard County. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Bobby Gene Ross appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief by the- Circuit Court of Howard County. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Ross v. State, 413 S.W.3d 33, 2013 WL 5797666, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1284 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

413 S.W.3d 33 (Ross v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.