Ross v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ross v. State

939 S.W.2d 57, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 302, 1997 WL 90933

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 25, 1997·No. No. 71016·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the dismissal, without an. evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant pled guilty to one count of first degree tampering, § 569.080, RSMo 1994, and the court sentenced him to a five year prison term. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and [58]*58find the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the dismissal, without an. evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant pled guilty to one count of first degree tampering, § 569.080, RSMo 1994, and the court sentenced him to a five year prison term. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and [58]*58find the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. Rule 84.16(b).

Ross v. State, 939 S.W.2d 57, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 302, 1997 WL 90933 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

939 S.W.2d 57 (Ross v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.