Ross v. State

310 S.E.2d 9, 168 Ga. App. 531, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2839
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 20, 1983·No. 67089·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

The defendant appeals the revocation of his probation. Held:

Only slight evidence of a violation of the terms and conditions of probation is necessary to revoke a probated sentence. The quality or quantity necessary for revocation is not that demanded for conviction of a crime. See Green v. State, 158 Ga. App. 864, 865 (282 SE2d 417). See also Johnson v. State, 240 Ga. 526, 527 (242 SE2d 53), affirming s.c. 142 Ga. App. 124 (235 SE2d 550). The evidence was sufficient to support the revocation of defendant’s probation. See State v. Brinson, 248 Ga. 380 (283 SE2d 463); Lynch v. State, 158 Ga. App. 232, 233 (279 SE2d 537); Mobley v. State, 158 Ga. App. 508 (281 SE2d 277).

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman, C. J, and Birdsong, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ross v. State, 310 S.E.2d 9, 168 Ga. App. 531, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2839 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983).

310 S.E.2d 9 (Ross v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bryant v. State
322 S.E.2d 524 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)