Ross v. State
This text of 79 S.E. 746 (Ross v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The accusation contained two counts. The first count charged generally the selling of intoxicating liquors. The second count charged the accused with having furnished liquor to Clarence Hogan, a minor, Without first securing the written authority of the “parent and guardian” of said Clarence Hogan. The accused filed a special demurrer to the second count of the indictment, on the ground that the words “parent and guardian” were used instead of the words “parent or guardian.” The court overruled the demurrer. Held, no error.
2. There was some evidence to support both counts of the indictment, although not entirely satisfactory; hut since the trial judge approved the verdict, this court will not interfere. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 S.E. 746, 13 Ga. App. 659, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-state-gactapp-1913.